IFS and BRC Broker

IFS and BRC certifications have become key standards in the food industry to ensure safety, traceability, and regulatory compliance. However, they impose stringent and burdensome documentation requirements. For quality teams, this translates into manual and time-consuming management, often a source of errors and outdated data. Faced with this complexity, digitizing document processes is becoming essential to ensure compliance and performance.
Published on
June 24, 2025

IFS and BRC: key certifications for food safety and their impact on quality teams

In the food industry, ensuring safety, regulatory compliance, and customer satisfaction is a daily challenge. To address this challenge, many companies are turning to internationally recognized certifications such as IFS and BRC. These standards help structure, formalize, and demonstrate control over the supply chain.

But behind these quality commitments lie colossal documentary requirements, particularly for quality teams.

Increasingly demanding regulatory and normative obligations

IFS and BRC certifications are part of a strict legal framework, which requires traceability and risk management throughout the food chain.

In addition, customer specifications and the specific requirements of the IFS/BRC standards require companies to collect a large number of supporting documents from their suppliers, in two main areas:

  • Supplier processes: certificates (IFS, BRC, ISO), quality questionnaires, codes of conduct, CSR commitments, etc.
  • Products (raw materials, packaging, ingredients): technical data sheets, analysis results, certificates of conformity, regulatory declarations, control plans, etc.

Manual processes that undermine quality performance

Today, in many agri-food companies, this documentary collection still relies on manual, often archaic methods, which heavily mobilize quality teams:

  • Email reminders to suppliers
  • Multiple formats (PDF, Word, Excel, etc.)
  • Manual classification in sometimes incomprehensible folder trees
  • Excel tracking of validity dates, responses, and evaluations
  • Manually copy data from documents to tracking files
  • Manual assessments, prone to errors

As a result, there is a lot of often outdated data, very long processing times, a significant mental load for teams, and a lack of a global and reliable vision of supplier risks.

A real impact on quality teams

Far from being simple administrative tasks, these processes have a direct impact on the ability of quality teams to:

  • Effectively manage supplier compliance
  • Prepare calmly for an IFS or BRC audit
  • Meeting customers' growing documentary requirements
  • Identify at-risk suppliers
  • Act quickly in the event of non-compliance or health alerts

However, when these tasks are time-consuming and have low added value, teams are held back in their high-value missions (risk analysis, quality management, continuous improvement, etc.).

Towards essential digitalization of quality document management

Given these findings, it has become imperative for IFS or BRC-certified companies to digitize their supplier document management. Tracklab offers solutions for:

  • Automate reminders and document collections
  • Centralize and standardize information
  • Track validity statuses in real time
  • Have a clear, concise and up-to-date vision of supplier compliance

All posts

Latest blog posts

IFS and BRC certifications have become key standards in the food industry to ensure safety, traceability, and regulatory compliance. However, they impose stringent and burdensome documentation requirements. For quality teams, this translates into manual and time-consuming management, often a source of errors and outdated data. Faced with this complexity, digitizing document processes is becoming essential to ensure compliance and performance.
The traceability of certified agricultural products is becoming an increasingly important issue. This is precisely the objective of the GLOBALG.AP Chain of Custody (CoC) standard: to ensure that products bearing a GLOBALG.AP certificate actually come from certified farms, and that their integrity is preserved throughout the supply chain.
For several years, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential pillar of the strategy of large organizations. In this context, the duty of care has become a structuring legal framework, requiring companies to anticipate and prevent serious risks related to their activities, particularly regarding human rights, the environment, and health. But what does this duty of care actually consist of, and how should companies comply with it?
Subscribe to our newsletter to keep up to date with our latest news!
By clicking on "Sign up" you agree to be contacted by Tracklab. For more information, see our privacy policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© 2025 Tracklab. All rights reserved.
Legal notice
Privacy policy